Funding Promiscuity - As anyone with an inkling on the subject of government funding knows, a lot of things get tax cash that the normal, sane, commonsense person would find wasteful or silly. Which is one of the reasons the government has oversight committees. Which admittedly, fail often for political reasons (i.e., NEA), but none-the-less that is why they exist, to oversee spending and make sure that the tax money is being put to good use.
Of course, quite often those receiving the funds cry foul in regard to having an overseer. The claim, as recorded in The Washington Times article by Robert Stacy McCain, goes like this:
"I urge you in the strongest possible terms to denounce this scientific McCarthyism. Imposing ideological shackles on this research would be a serious public health mistake."
That quote is from California Democrat Representative Henry A. Waxman. He was upset that some Republicans were questioning the some funds being doled out in the arena of sex research.
But the proof is in the pudding to use the cliche. McCain's article concerns one sex research grant to the tune of $1 Million in tax payer funds handed over to the University of Maryland. The University was supposed to be conducting a study on AIDS prevention in youth. In other words, 'Is the Safe-Sex, condom endorsing, program achieving its aims?'
The thing is, the researches fabricated, made up, fictionalized, invented, manufactured, cooked the books, and concocted interviews that never took place. In other words that $1 Million in tax payer money was spent on a work of fiction. The whole project is tainted.
Which begs the question, 'Are there more research projects of fiction out there funded by tax payer money?'
Which is why some in Washington want tighter oversight and investigations into the use of Tax Payer funds. But to this Rep. Waxman screams, "McCarthyism!"
Of course the biggest sham is the need for sex studies in the first place. This safe-sex policy is really an endorsement of promiscuity, an endorsement to sin. If we could just have an abstinence program that details the results of sex outside of marriage in all its horrific truths, mental and physical, then we could funnel a bunch of money toward finding cures for diseases, many of which would disappear after a generation or two if holiness and purity were practiced.
The Great Separation continues.
