Life? What life? - Just as a judge has declared that America's ban on partial birth abortions is unconstitutional comes a report on LifeSiteNews.com about the continued use of eugenics in Great Britain.
First, on the event here in the states, David Kravets writes:
Abortion proponents... argued that a woman's health during an abortion is more important than how the fetus is terminated, and that the banned method is often a safer solution that a conventional abortion, in which the fetus is dismembered in the womb and then removed in pieces.
Which reminds of the post of this morning about a woman alone on a mountain who, having no way to get to a hospital 50 miles distant, decided her child's life was of more importance than her life and so performed a caesarian on herself with a household knife.
Which brings me back to the LifeSiteNews.com report:
The UK's Daily Mail has revealed that British women are increasingly eliminating their unborn children because of non life-threatening deformities such as deformed feet or cleft lips and palates. The report also reveals that more Down's Syndrome babies are now killed than are allowed to be born. With improved screening, the author warns, the trend looks likely to only increase.
Just what does that say about how a society values the disabled people in it's midst today?
The Great Separation continues.
